In a major move that’s stirring up the social media world, Mark Zuckerberg announced Meta will say goodbye to its fact-checking program on Facebook and Instagram. The company plans to replace it with a system similar to X’s community notes, where users themselves will help identify what’s true and what’s not. The change comes at an interesting time, just before Donald Trump returns to the White House. Meta’s decision seems to reflect a broader shift in how social media platforms handle content moderation.
Meta is making several big changes to how it manages content on its platforms. The biggest one is dropping independent fact-checkers and letting users add notes to posts they think need more context. They’re also moving their content moderation team from California to Texas and easing up on some content restrictions around topics like immigration and gender.
Zuckerberg admits this is a trade-off. “We’ll catch less bad stuff,” he says, but argues it will also mean fewer mistakes where legitimate posts get taken down by accident.
According to Zuckerberg, the current fact-checking system has “destroyed more trust than it’s created.” He believes fact-checkers have shown too much political bias in what they choose to check and how they check it. The company’s new head of global affairs, Joel Kaplan, puts it plainly: the partnerships with fact-checkers started with good intentions but ended up showing too much political bias. For regular Facebook and Instagram users, this change could mean seeing more controversial content in their feeds. Meta says it will still crack down hard on clearly illegal content and serious violations, but other potentially misleading posts might stick around longer or get different kinds of community feedback instead of official fact-check labels.

This move by Meta could set a new trend in how social media platforms handle content moderation. We’re already seeing X using a similar community-based approach, and now with Meta following suit, other platforms might rethink their content moderation strategies too. Whether this change will lead to better online discussions or more confusion remains to be seen. What’s clear is that social media’s approach to managing information is entering a new chapter, and users will play a bigger role in deciding what’s trustworthy and what’s not.